|
Advertising by Google
How foreigner tourists evaluate the city of Rio de Janeiro
Data below are the results of a survey conducted by Embratur, the Brazilian Travel Authority, to collect opinions of foreigner travellers about their stay in Rio de Janeiro. Read more about Embratur survey, which subsidized a Study on International Tourism in Brazil.
Purpose of the trip (%)
|
Leisure / Holidays/ Vacation
|
58.80 |
Business / Conventions
|
23.75 |
Visits fo Family and/or Friends
|
13.43 |
Study / Teaching / Research
|
1.39 |
Religion / Pilgrimage
|
0.33 |
Health treament
|
0.16 |
Others
|
2.14 |
Factors of influence in the decision to visit Brazil (%)
|
Information from friends
|
52.48 |
Internet
|
10.99 |
Television
|
8.05 |
Folders / Printed Guides
|
7.12 |
Magazines
|
6.35 |
Newspapers
|
2.48 |
Other
|
12.54 |
Age brackets (%)
|
18 - 27 y.o.
|
18.12 |
28 - 45 y.o.
|
48.68 |
46 - 65 y.o.
|
29.21 |
over 65 y.o.
|
3.99 |
Level of Education (%)
|
Elementary
|
3.19 |
Intermediary
|
22.83 |
Superior
|
73.98 |
Occupation (%)
|
Engineer
|
9.90 |
Student
|
7.11 |
Entrepreneur
|
6.15 |
Retired
|
5.27 |
Professor / Teacher
|
4.79 |
Business Manager
|
4.07 |
Commerce
|
3.12 |
Companionship (%)
|
Alone
|
28.88 |
With family
|
34.27 |
With friends
|
33.93 |
Travel package
|
3.46 |
Average annual income
|
US$ 39,338.75
|
Organization of the trip (%)
|
Not organized by travel agencies
|
76.57 |
Organized by travel agencies
|
23.43 |
Repeat trips to Brazil (%)
|
First time trip
|
49.60 |
Not first trip
|
50.40 |
Intention of returning to Brazil (%)
|
Have the intention to return to Brazil
|
93.52 |
Do not have the intention to return to Brazil
|
6.48 |
Averagage staying
|
8.12 days
|
Average spending per person
|
US$ 99.98
|
Other cities visited (%)
|
Sao Paulo
|
16.25 |
Salvador
|
14.10 |
Foz do Iguacu
|
13.86 |
Buzios
|
7.49 |
Parati
|
5.18 |
Manaus
|
4.46 |
Lodging (%)
|
Hotels
|
70.28 |
Family / Friends
|
20.00 |
House / Flat Own
|
5.14 |
House / Flat Rented
|
2.57 |
Camping
|
0.34 |
Other
|
1.67 |
Hotels Evaluation (%) |
Evaluation |
Cleanness |
Services |
Price |
Excellent |
47.61 |
50.07 |
36.14 |
Good |
44.94 |
43.18 |
47.90 |
Regular |
6.85 |
5.70 |
13.78 |
Bad |
0.60 |
1.05 |
2.18 |
Restaurants Evaluation (%) |
Evaluation |
Cleanness |
Services |
Food Quality |
Prices |
Typical food |
Excellent |
27.62 |
38.30 |
50.06 |
47.40 |
44.19 |
Good |
59.82 |
55.11 |
44.04 |
41.18 |
49.66 |
Regular |
11.42 |
6.14 |
4.94 |
10.50 |
5.69 |
Bad |
1.14 |
0.45 |
0.96 |
0.92 |
0.46 |
Tourist Information (%) |
Evaluation |
Availability of information |
Accuracy of information |
Excellent |
27.51 |
24.66 |
Good |
56.68 |
58.27 |
Regular |
10.63 |
11.38 |
Bad |
5.18 |
5.69 |
Tourist Guides (%) |
Evaluation |
Services |
Time keeping |
Excellent |
45.96 |
47.36 |
Good |
47.21 |
44.27 |
Regular |
4.66 |
7.14 |
Bad |
2.17 |
1.23 |
Most common complaints (%) |
Safety |
14.04 |
Dirtiness |
10.65 |
Telecommunications |
7.56 |
Tourist information |
7.06 |
Public Transportation |
4.03 |
Taxi |
4.01 |
Nightlife |
1.71 |
Meeting of expectations (%) |
Expectations exceeded |
36.00 |
Expectations fully met |
52.88 |
Expectations partially met |
9.12 |
Disappointed |
2.00 |
Back to Top
|